Category

Cognizance & Charges
Brief Facts A discharge application was filed by a person accused of offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for having possessed assets disproportionate to his known sources of income) and the same was dismissed by the Trial Court. The Trial Court refused to consider this objection on the ground that a roving inquiry...
Read More
Issues Whether the dying declaration will be reliable if, at the time when the dying declaration was recorded, there was no emergency and/or any danger to the life of the deceased? Whether Error/Omission/defect in framing of charges –would render the conviction improper and unsustainable? Whether non-recovery of weapons alleged to have been used by the...
Read More
Brief Facts In this case Manish Sisodia, then Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi had filed a criminal complaint against Manoj Kumar Tiwari & five ors. alleging that Manoj Kumar Tiwari made false and defamatory statements against the Complainant during the press conference and alleged that the Complainant was involved in corrupt practices in the matter...
Read More
Brief Facts In this case the Complainant/Appellant lodged an FIR for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 504 IPC. The Investigating Officer, after completing the investigation, submitted a Negative Final Report. Being aggrieved by the said report, the appellant-complainant filed a Protest Petition before the concerned CJM. The Magistrate rejected the...
Read More
Brief Facts The case pertained to a blind murder wherein the Respondent No. 1 along with Respondent No. 2 and others were alleged to have conspired to kill the deceased through unknown assailants. After registration of FIR, investigation was conducted and statements of number of persons were recorded under Section 161 and 164 of Cr.P.C....
Read More
Brief Facts Proceedings were initiated against the Respondent-Accused under the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act, 1988 and against the same an application for discharge was filed by the Respondent, stating that the investigating officer failed to consider the written explanation submitted by accused along with supporting documents and the conclusion reached by the sanctioning authority...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant had shared on his Facebook account on 05.04.2020, a viral picture of then sitting Cabinet Minister of the State of Maharashtra, criticizing his act of ridiculing the Prime Minister of India. Thereafter, at around 11:50 on the same day four Policemen, two dressed in civilian dress and other two in uniform,...
Read More
1 2

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."