0141-4036587
·
mkalegal.jaipur@gmail.com
·
Mon - Sat 10:00AM to 09:00 PM
Connect us

By

Mohit Khandelwal & Associates
13
May

Surendran v. State of Kerala, Criminal Appeal No. 1080 of 2019

May 13, 2025
Brief Facts In this case the accused persons were charged for offence under Section 304-B and 498-A of the IPC as the deceased had committed suicide after being harassed for the demand of dowry. The Trial Court convicted the accused persons for offence under Section 304-B and 498-A of IPC. The Appellate Court acquitted the...
Read More
13
May

Tulesh Kumar Sahu Versus State of Chhattisgarh, Criminal Appeal No. 753 Of 2021

May 13, 2025
Issues Whether the court can convict a person for murder solely on basis of recovery of stolen article from the accused? What is the test to check the authenticity of the recoveries made from the accused? Held The Apex Court acquitted the accused by reversing the judgment of the High Court. Apex Court referred the...
Read More
13
May

Munikrishna @ Krishna Etc. v.. State by Ulsoor PS, Criminal Appeal Nos.1597-1600 of 2022

May 13, 2025
Brief Facts In this case the Trial Court and the High Court relied on the voluntary statements of the accused and their videography statements made before the Police for convicting the Accused. Issues Whether video of confession made before police is admissible in evidence? Held The Apex Court acquitted the accused as the offence was...
Read More
13
May

State of M.P v. Ramji Lal Sharma, Criminal Appeal No. 293 of 2022

May 13, 2025
Brief Facts In this case, the Trial Court held all the accused guilty for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced all the accused to undergo life imprisonment. Allowing the appeal filed by three accused, the High Court acquitted them observing that there are contradictions in the...
Read More
13
May

Jai Prakash Tiwari v. State of Madhya Pradesh, (Criminal Appeal No. 704/2018)

May 13, 2025
Issues Purpose of Section 313 Cr.P.C. Whether failure to ask questions from an accused u/s 313 CrPC would vitiate the entire trial? Held Apex Court allowed an appeal and set aside the conviction of accused for offence of attempt to murder. The purpose of Section 313 CrPC is to provide the accused a reasonable opportunity...
Read More
13
May

Gireesan Nair v. State of Kerala Criminal Appeal 1864-1865/2010

May 13, 2025
Issues The object of conducting a Test Identification Parade Admissibility of evidence of Test Identification Parade Whether evidence of TIP is admissible if the witness had the opportunity to see accused before conducting TIP? Whether TIP conducted in front of the I.O. is admissible? Held The Apex Court acquitted the accused considering the fact that...
Read More
13
May

Makhan Singh v State of Haryana, (Criminal Appeal No. 1290 of 2010)

May 13, 2025
Issues Whether Dying Declaration can be made the sole basis for conviction? Which type of dying declaration is to be relied upon if a case involves multiple dying declarations which are mutually inconsistent? Held The Court is required to examine as to whether the dying declaration is true and reliable; as to whether it has...
Read More
13
May

Pappu Tiwary v. State of Jharkhand, Criminal Appeal No.1492 of 2021

May 13, 2025
Issues Whether an inquest report is a substantive piece of evidence? Who has the burden of proof in the case when the plea of alibi is taken by the accused? Whether testimony of informant to be taken into account even if given by close relative? Held An inquest report is not substantive evidence and the...
Read More
13
May

Raju Vs. State of Rajasthan, Criminal Appeal No. 1559 with 1560 of 2022

May 13, 2025
Issues Approach of the courts in a case based on circumstantial evidence where there is no direct evidence of guilt of accused. Held The accused were acquitted by the Apex Court from the offence. under section 302/34 IPC as the prosecution failed to prove the guilt and complete the chain of events which may lead...
Read More
13
May

Anuj Singh alias Ramanuj Singh alias Seth Singh v. State of Bihar, Criminal Appeal No. 150/2020

May 13, 2025
Brief Facts Accused persons were convicted for an offence under section 307 IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act. The High Court modified the conviction to an offence under section 324 IPC read with section 27 of the Arms Act. Issues Whether the testimony of the witness be disregarded merely because of minor contradictions...
Read More
1 2 3 … 17

Recent Comments

    "Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

    There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

    The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

    We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

    However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."

    I AGREE