0141-4036587
·
mkalegal.jaipur@gmail.com
·
Mon - Sat 10:00AM to 09:00 PM
Connect us

Month

September 2026
12
Sep

Rajesh Viren Shah v. Redington (India) Limited., Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.6905 of 2022

September 12, 2026
Brief Facts The Appellants, Rajesh Viren Shah and Sanjay Babulal Bhutada (Directors of the Company), were implicated as accused individuals in a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, pertaining to the dishonouring of cheques dated 22 March 2014 issued by the Respondent Company. However, these directors had resigned from the...
Read More
12
Sep

Ajitsinh Chehuji Rathod v. State of Gujarat & Anr., Criminal Appeal No. 478 of 2024

September 12, 2026
Brief Facts The appellant challenged the rejection of his application under Section 482 CrPC by the Gujarat High Court of a case under Section 138 of the NI Act. The appellant was accused of issuing a cheque for Rs. 10 lakhs that was dishonoured due to “insufficient funds and dormant account.” During trial, the appellant...
Read More
12
Sep

Prem Raj v. Poonamma Menon & Anr. Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9778/2018

September 12, 2026
Brief Facts Appellant herein challenged the judgment and order dated 23rd January, 2018 passed in Crl. R.P. No. 1111 of 2011, whereby the High Court of Kerala allowed, only in part, his Revision Petition against the judgment and order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Thrissur, dated 11th January, 2011, in Criminal Appeal No. 673...
Read More
12
Sep

M/s Rajco Steel Enterprises v. Kavita Saraff and Another Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 5583 / 2022

September 12, 2026
Brief Facts Four independent complaint cases were lodged in the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate, Kolkata by the Petitioner which were registered as CC Nos. 34905, 34906, 34907 and 34908 of 2009 respectively. The facts of the case are that the Petitioner had granted financial assistance to the Accused/Respondent No. 1, in discharge of which...
Read More
12
Sep

Raj Reddy Kallem v. State of Haryana & Anr. Criminal Appeal No. 2210/2024

September 12, 2026
Brief Facts In 2012, Respondent No.2-complainant paid Rs. 1.55 crores advance to Appellant’s company for supply of a fiber laser cutting machine, which was never delivered. The Appellant issued 5 cheques for refund, which were dishonoured, leading to proceedings u/s 138 NI Act and FIR u/s 406, 420, 120B IPC. The Appellant was convicted by...
Read More
12
Sep

Dhanasingh Prabhu V. Chandrasekar & Another, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.5706 Of 2024

September 12, 2026
Brief Facts Respondent No. 1 and 2 are the partners of M/s Mouriya Coirs. Respondent No. 1 issued the cheque of the Firm in favour of the Complainant and the cheque was returned unpaid. Complainant issued demand notice to the Respondents and later filed the NI Complaint. The Respondents challenged the complainant and contested that...
Read More

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."

I AGREE