Day

May 8, 2025
Brief Facts In this case, the Appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 120-B IPC. The two other co-accused persons (A-1 and A-2) were convicted for the offence of theft, house-trespass and destruction of valuable property. The case pertained to theft in the Bank wherein the theft was carried out in locker room without...
Read More
Brief Facts As per the case of the prosecution, a complaint was lodged by PW-1 Ramathilagam, mother of the victim therein alleging that all the accused her son-in-law, his mother, her daughter and father-in-law were harassing the deceased and she was subjected to torture/cruelty for want of jewels. It was alleged that due to which...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellants were the husband and mother-in-law of the deceased who was found dead in her bathroom on 05.11.2014 i.e. after 9 years of her marriage. Both the deceased and her husband were doctors by profession and there was no complaint of harassment during this period. After 21 days of her death, the...
Read More
Brief Facts In the present case the Investigation Officer had filed the charge sheet against the accused persons for commission of offence under section 302 IPC. However, at the time of framing of charge, the Trial Court framed the charges under section 304 IPC after considering that as per post mortem report, the cause of...
Read More
Brief Facts In this case, the deceased persons were in a love affair that was not approved by the father of the deceased girl and her uncle. On 02.12.1994 both the deceased went missing and on 11.12.1994 their bodies were found hanging on a cashew tree. Their bodies were in a decomposed state and as...
Read More
Issues What are the essential ingredients for convicting a person for the offence under Section 411 of the I.P.C? Whether the fact of selling the articles alleged to be theft at a lower price itself can lead to a conclusion that the accused was aware of theft of those articles? Whether the confessional statement of...
Read More
Brief Facts Petitioners in the present case were the intruders who open fired at Red Fort resulting killing of 3 army men. The Appellants were convicted by the Trial Court punished with death sentence. The Death Reference made before the High Court was rejected and even the appeals were dismissed by the Apex Court vide...
Read More
Issues Whether the opinion of the handwriting expert is the only way or mode of proving the signature and handwriting of a person? Whether the order of cognizance for offence under Section 467 and 471 of IPC can be quashed only on the ground that the opinion of the handwriting expert was not conclusive? Held...
Read More
Issues Whether the absence of motive in a case of circumstantial evidence weighs in favour of the accused? Whether the last seen theory must establish the proximity of time? Held The Apex Court acquitted the accused persons by setting aside the order of the High Court. In a case based on substantial (circumstantial) evidence, motive...
Read More
Issues Whether the prosecution is required to prove its case beyond all iota of doubt? Whether the accused can be acquitted on the ground that the trial has taken years and other accused had died during the pendency of appeal? Held The Apex Court upheld the conviction and denied to interfere in the concurrent findings...
Read More
1 2

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."