Category

Evidence During Trial
Brief Facts The Appellants, the father and mother-in-law of the deceased, who died at her matrimonial home due to extensive burn injuries. The deceased died after 18 days of giving birth to a male child. An FIR was lodges u/s 304B and 498A, IPC. It was alleged that pursuant to birth of child a dowry...
Read More
Brief Facts FIR was filed against the accused Appellants, A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5 u/s 302, 307, 148, r/w 149, IPC, u/s 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. It was alleged that the scooter of A-1 bumped into PW-3 causing him minor injuries to little and ring figure and thereafter PW-3 slapped A-1....
Read More
Brief Facts That the Appellant who was charged with facilitating the issuance of a second passport a person, who already possessed an Indian passport. Two other employees at the Passport Office were also implicated in facilitating the illegal issuance of the second passport. However, these two were acquitted and the CBI did not challenge the...
Read More
Brief Facts Rahul (PW-1) and Sachin (deceased) had pre-existing disputes with Sunil @ Sonu (Accused No. 1) and Satish (Accused No. 2). On 28th November, 2016, the Accused No. 1, Accused No. 2, Gaurav (Accused No. 3) and Nitin @ Devender (Accused No. 4) abused PW-1 and the deceased. The accused persons attacked PW-1 and...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellants, Saheb (Accused No. 3) and Sitaram Pandurang Gabare (Accused No. 5), were convicted by Trial Court for the murder of Madhavrao Krishnaji Gabare. The prosecution’s case primarily relied on the testimony of Janakibai Gabare, the widow of the deceased, who saw the incident at night and identified the appellants as key...
Read More
Brief Facts In this case the accused persons were charged for offence under Section 304-B and 498-A of the IPC as the deceased had committed suicide after being harassed for the demand of dowry. The Trial Court convicted the accused persons for offence under Section 304-B and 498-A of IPC. The Appellate Court acquitted the...
Read More
Issues Whether the court can convict a person for murder solely on basis of recovery of stolen article from the accused? What is the test to check the authenticity of the recoveries made from the accused? Held The Apex Court acquitted the accused by reversing the judgment of the High Court. Apex Court referred the...
Read More
Brief Facts In this case the Trial Court and the High Court relied on the voluntary statements of the accused and their videography statements made before the Police for convicting the Accused. Issues Whether video of confession made before police is admissible in evidence? Held The Apex Court acquitted the accused as the offence was...
Read More
Brief Facts In this case, the Trial Court held all the accused guilty for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced all the accused to undergo life imprisonment. Allowing the appeal filed by three accused, the High Court acquitted them observing that there are contradictions in the...
Read More
Issues Purpose of Section 313 Cr.P.C. Whether failure to ask questions from an accused u/s 313 CrPC would vitiate the entire trial? Held Apex Court allowed an appeal and set aside the conviction of accused for offence of attempt to murder. The purpose of Section 313 CrPC is to provide the accused a reasonable opportunity...
Read More
1 2 3 4 5

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."