By

Mohit Khandelwal & Associates
Brief Facts The appellant-accused was acquitted by the Trial Court for the offence under the Customs Act of 1962. Against the acquittal, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (“DRI”) filed an appeal under Section 378 of Cr.P.C. before the High Court accompanied by an application of condonation of delay since the appeal was belated by 72...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant suffered a sulfuric acid attack, leading to 30-40% burns and permanent disfigurement of her face, chest, and hands. The accused persons were convicted u/s 307 and 326A r/w 149, IPC, 1860. The Trial Court sentenced the accused to Life Imprisonment. The High Court suspended sentence of the convicted persons, private respondents...
Read More
Brief Facts It was alleged that the appellant, Fuleshwar Gope was an associate of the People’s Liberation Front of India and was acquainted with the facts that Dinesh Gope @ Kuldeep Yadav @ Banku (A-6) was a terrorist and the chief of PLFI who collected money through extortion. He was further said to have criminally...
Read More
Brief Facts The Complainant, a supplier of horse feed, filed a complaint against the Appellants, alleging offences u/s 120B, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Complainant’s firm had been supplying horse feed, barley, and oats to Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. since 1990. In 1995, the Complainant was instructed to issue...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant (Editor of an online news channel) published a video on YouTube, levelling certain allegations against the Complainant. The Complainant MLA, representing the Kunnathunad constituency (seat reserved for the members of the Scheduled Castes)  aggrieved by the aforesaid video, filed a complaint, alleging commission of offences u/s 3(1)(r),(u) of the Scheduled Castes...
Read More
Brief Facts Rahul (PW-1) and Sachin (deceased) had pre-existing disputes with Sunil @ Sonu (Accused No. 1) and Satish (Accused No. 2). On 28th November, 2016, the Accused No. 1, Accused No. 2, Gaurav (Accused No. 3) and Nitin @ Devender (Accused No. 4) abused PW-1 and the deceased. The accused persons attacked PW-1 and...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant-Complainant had filed a complaint u/s 156(3), CrPC, 1973, against M/s SS Infrastructure Co. and its partners, alleging that they had committed offenses u/s 384, 389, 406, and 420 r/w Sec. 34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Appellant-Complainant had filed a complaint u/s 156(3), CrPC, 1973, against M/s...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant (Editor of an online news channel) published a video on YouTube, levelling certain allegations against the Complainant. The Complainant MLA, representing the Kunnathunad constituency (seat reserved for the members of the Scheduled Castes)  aggrieved by the aforesaid video, filed a complaint,  alleging commission of offences u/s 3(1) (r), (u) of the...
Read More
Brief Facts The accused persons availed credit facilities from Indian Bank, however, due to non-payment, the loan account was classified as NPA.  The Bank filed a recovery case before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and during pendency of such proceedings, the Bank discovered that the mortgage documents were forged. Pursuant to the complaint of the...
Read More
Brief Facts On 14th October 2000, a regular case under section 154 of CrPC was registered against all 5 accused alleging commission of offences punishable under section 120-B, 420, 468 and 471 of IPC 1860 and section 13(2) and 13(1)(d) of prevention of corruption act 1988. It was alleged that accused 1 while being on...
Read More
1 2 3 4 5 20

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."