Category

I.P.C.
Brief Facts The Appellant, the owner of a daily newspaper faced prosecution for criminal defamation under Section 500 of the IPC. The Respondent-Complainant filed a complaint claiming that the Appellant allowed the defamatory news article to be published titled “Advocate ne pan masala vyavasayi par karaya jhuta mamla darj” in his newspaper, without verifying the...
Read More
Brief Facts The appellant (wife) and respondent (husband) were living in London, but the husband abandoned the wife, leading her to live with relatives. The wife later gave birth to a child in India and, following the husband’s instructions, applied for a passport for the child. Since, the husband was causing the physical and mental...
Read More
Brief Facts This appeal challenged the High Court’s rejection of the appellant’s application for quashing of the proceedings under Sections 376 and 506 IPC. The relationship of the appellant with the complainant was against the wishes of the parents but they decided to reside together which was followed by marriage. The complainant filed an affidavit stating...
Read More
Brief Facts The second Respondent filed a complaint alleging that the Appellant had made false promises of marriage and engaged in a physical relationship with her starting in 2012. Despite their engagement in 2017, the Appellant later married another woman in February 2018, against which the complaint was filed. Hence, Appeal praying for quashing of...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant (accused no. 2) was convicted alongside accused no. 1 under Section 302, IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act. The Prosecution’s case included eyewitness testimony, ballistic evidence linking the Appellant to the murder weapon, and recovery of the firearm at the Appellant’s instance. The High Court upheld the conviction and...
Read More
Brief Facts On 21st October, 2009, the half-burnt body of Shiva alias Sanwar (hereinafter referred to as ‘deceased’) was found behind Baba Balak Nath temple near Shastri Nagar ground. Based on the information given by one Pramod Kumar (P.W.3), merg intimation Ex. P-33 was registered against unknown persons. It was alleged that Appellant and Accused...
Read More
Brief Facts The incident occurred on 08.06.2007 around 8:45 PM in front of Machchu Hotel near Shukla Hotel, Jabalpur, where one Pappu alias Rajendra Yadav was allegedly assaulted and killed when he was coming out of the hotel with his friends Virendra and Amit Jha. Four persons were accused of assaulting the deceased with knife...
Read More
Brief Facts An incident took place on 09.01.1999 in Haryana, in which Akbar (deceased) was killed and Deenu (PW-1), Ahmad (PW-2), and Harun were injured. Four accused—Mohd. Yunus (A1), Mohd. Jamil (A2), Ghasita (A3), and Akhtar Hussain (A4)—were charged under Sections 302, 323, and 34 IPC. According to the prosecution, on 09.01.1999 at 9:10 PM,...
Read More
Brief Facts FIR was filed by the complainant against the appellant on the accusations of rape (Section 376 IPC) and criminal intimidation (Section 506 IPC). Subsequently, the appellant filed a petition before the High Court seeking the quashing of the FIR, which was dismissed. The complainant had claimed that the appellant, who was running IIT...
Read More
Brief Facts Complainant (Respondent No. 3) is the wife of deceased Ashok Kumar who committed suicide. As per the version of the Complainant she took a loan of Rs. 60,000/- from the Appellant accused. On 15.06.2017, accused made to the shop of Complainant and abused, assaulted and threated the deceased due to non-payment of loan...
Read More
1 2 3 4 5

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."