Category

Unlawful Activities Activities Prevention Act, 1967 (UAPA)
Brief Facts A 4-year-old child went missing from School. The accused, P. Manikandan, who was known to the child’s father and had borrowed `5 lakhs from him, was alleged to havekidnapped and murdered the child. The Police registered the case under Sections 364A and 302 IPC. The Trial Court convicted the accused and sentenced him to death. On appeal, the Madras High Court (Division Bench) acquitted the accused....
Read More
Brief Facts The appellants were convicted under Sections 323, 324, and 325 IPC, and their conviction was upheld by the High Court. During appeal, they produced a family compromise deed showing that the dispute with their relatives had been amicably settled with unconditional apology. The Appellant prayed for compounding the offences based on the Compromise....
Read More
Brief Facts The complainant (Appellant) alleged that Respondent No. 2 & 3 agreed to take his truck on monthly rentpursuant to which an agreement was executed for the period between 14.07.2014 to 31.03.2016, and the truck was handed over. It was alleged that no rent was paid after the first month, and the truck remained...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant misled his pregnant daughter (deceased), into accompanying him in an autorickshaw to a Hospital. She had married inter-caste against the wishes of the Appellant. Upon reaching the Hospital, the Appellant asked the driver (PW 2) to fetch a watchmen. However, when he returned he found the appellant strangulating Pramila with a...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant reported that robbers had entered his flat, killed his mother (Shobha), wife (Archana), and two-year-old daughter (Kimaya), and injured a neighbour (PW-12, Madhusudhan Kulkarni), while also stealing valuables. Initial investigation found no forced entry and the alleged stollen valuables hidden inside the house. Police, during the investigation found that the appellant...
Read More
Brief Facts It was alleged that the appellant, Fuleshwar Gope was an associate of the People’s Liberation Front of India and was acquainted with the facts that Dinesh Gope @ Kuldeep Yadav @ Banku (A-6) was a terrorist and the chief of PLFI who collected money through extortion. He was further said to have criminally...
Read More
Brief Facts An FIR was registered in 2020 against the Respondent for offences under Sections 13, 18 and 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as Act of 1967), Section 201/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, pursuant to which the Respondent was arrested on 18.06.2020....
Read More
Brief Facts In this Appeal the NIA investigated a module of the banned terrorist organization that aimed to further the Khalistan separatist movement. Accused were arrested after being linked to terrorist activities, including attempts to procure weapons. The appellant’s involvement was based on a disclosure statement by a co-accused, describing a trip to procure weapons....
Read More
Brief Facts An FIR was lodged against the appellant/accused by the informant inspector under Sections 121A, 489B, and 489C of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 16 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA). It was alleged that fake Indian currency notes of the denomination of Rs. 1,000 and Rs. 500/-, totalling a...
Read More
Brief Facts In this Appeal the NIO investigated a module of the banned terrorist organization that aimed to further the Khalistan separatist movement. Accused were arrested after being linked to terrorist activities, including attempts to procure weapons. The appellant’s involvement was based on a disclosure statement by a co-accused, describing a trip to procure weapons....
Read More
1 2

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."