0141-4036587
·
mkalegal.jaipur@gmail.com
·
Mon - Sat 10:00AM to 09:00 PM
Connect us

By

Mohit Khandelwal & Associates
16
Jun

Ashutosh Garg v. Union of India, S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 548/2024

June 16, 2026
Brief Facts The present bail application was filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner, who was arrested on 02.11.2023 in connection with offences under Sections 132(1)(b), (c), (f) and (l) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The complaint was filed by the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI),...
Read More
16
Jun

Rama Ram vs State of Rajasthan S.B. Criminal Misc. Interim Bail Application No. 258/2024

June 16, 2026
Brief Facts The Petitioner is an accused in connection with FIR No. 277/2022 registered at Police Station Pindwara, District Sirohi, for offences punishable under Sections 8/15 and 8/29 of the NDPS Act and he was in Jail. The Petitioner filed an application seeking interim bail for a period of one month on the ground that...
Read More
16
Jun

Shishpal vs. State of Rajasthan S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10994/2023

June 16, 2026
Brief Facts The Petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR for offences punishable under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act, 1985. The case was lodged after a seizure of 342 kilograms of poppy straw from a bus during a blockade on Suratgarh–Hanumangarh road on 16.02.2023. The contraband was recovered from the luggage compartment of the...
Read More
03
Jun

Amit Manilal Haria v. Commr, CGST, (2026) 157 GSTR 293

June 3, 2026
Court :- Hon’ble Bombay High Court In this Judgment it was categorically held by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court that Sec. 122(1A) applies where a person retains the benefit of the covered transaction and the transaction is conducted at his instance; penal statutes must be strictly construed, and Article 20(1) prohibits retrospective penal operation. Further...
Read More
14
Oct

Ram Singh v. State of U.P., Criminal Appeal No. 206 of 2024

October 14, 2025,
Brief Facts Case was pertaining to the death of a lady due to gunshot wound and FIR was lodged by her son alleging that the Appellant and Lala Ram came to his residence. Lala Ram had instigated Ram Singh by loudly saying that these people were creating disturbances; so kill them. Ram Singh fired on...
Read More
14
Oct

Directorate of Enforcement v. Niraj Tyagi, Criminal Appeal No. 843 of 2024 (@Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 10913 of 2023

October 14, 2025,
Brief Facts Between 2017 and 2020, IHFL sanctioned loans worth ₹2,801 crores to the Shipra Group, which defaulted on repayment. Consequently, IHFL auctioned Shipra Group’s property, Shipra Mall, which was purchased by Himri Estate. Mohit Singh, representing the Shipra Group, filed FIRs against IHFL and Himri Estate, alleging the mall was undervalued, causing state revenue...
Read More
09
Oct

Farhana v. State of Uttar Pradesh And Ors., Criminal Appeal No. 1003 of 2024 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 437 of 2023)

October 9, 2025,
Brief Facts The FIR was registered against the Appellant accused being a member of a gang which was involved in several criminal cases as enlisted in the FIR. The FIR narrated that the gang has a criminal history and consequently the FIR was registered under section 3(1) of the Gangster Act. The application was moved...
Read More
07
Oct

Gurwinder Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr. Criminal Appeal No. 704 of 2024

October 7, 2025
Brief Facts In this Appeal the NIO investigated a module of the banned terrorist organization that aimed to further the Khalistan separatist movement. Accused were arrested after being linked to terrorist activities, including attempts to procure weapons. The appellant’s involvement was based on a disclosure statement by a co-accused, describing a trip to procure weapons....
Read More
07
Oct

Rajesh Viren Shah v. Redington (India) Limited., Criminal Appeal Arising our of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 6905 of 2022

October 7, 2025
Brief Facts The appellants, Rajesh Viren Shah and Sanjay Babulal Bhutada (Directors of the Company), were implicated as accused individuals in a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, pertaining to the dishonouring of cheques dated 22 March 2014 issued by the Respondent Company. However, these directors had resigned from the...
Read More
07
Oct

Tejashwi Prasad Yadav v. Hareshbhai Pranshankar Mehta, Transfer Petition (Crl.) No. 846 of 2023

October 7, 2025,
Brief Facts The present petition sought a transfer of the complaint from the Court of ACMM Ahmedabad to a Court in Delhi. The Respondent filed a private complaint against the Petitioner alleging defamation under Section 499 and 500 of the IPC. The respondent claimed that the petitioner defamed the people of Gujarat by calling them...
Read More
1 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 30

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."

I AGREE