By

Mohit Khandelwal & Associates
Brief Facts A Food Inspector appointed under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PFA) visited ‘Easy day’ outlet on 29.11.2010 and purchased certain biscuit packets. Subsequently, on the next day, the acquired samples were dispatched to the State Food Laboratory in Bhopal for analysis. Further, the Public Analyst’s Report was received on 04.01.2011. Subsequently,...
Read More
Brief Facts That Appellant filed a criminal complaint before Magistrate Court on 20.02.2016 regarding dishonoured cheques worth Rs. 45,20,000. The court issued summons to the accused and subsequently the prosecution evidence, defense evidence has been conducted. During final arguments, the Magistrate determined that the complaint lacked territorial jurisdiction. Consequently, the Accused was discharged on 18.02.2020,...
Read More
Brief Facts The present appeal was preferred by the State of Rajasthan against the judgment passed by the High Court, allowing the application filed by the respondent – Asharam @ Ashumal under Section 391 of the CrPC, 1973 , and directing summoning and recording of evidence of Ajay Pal Lamba, who was posted as Deputy...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellants were convicted under Section 302 read with 149 IPC by the Sessions Court, which was confirmed by the High Court. They approached the Apex Court on the ground that conviction based upon unreliable testimony of a child witness is not sustainable as the witness has failed to rightly identify the accused...
Read More
Brief Facts The Complainant filed a complaint against some of the police officials stating that they entered the house of the Complainant and started beating and abusing the Complainant and his brother. These police officials looted the Complainant and his family members, snatched their gold chain and thereafter the Complainant and his family members were...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant was not named in the FIR registered under sections 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC and sections 3(1)(r) & (s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 (SC/ST Act). However, the Appellant was summoned by the Ld. Special Court to face the trial in exercise...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant was convicted by the Trial Court under section 302/149 of IPC and other related offences, including under the Arms Act, 1959. The two daughters of deceased Vijay Pal Singh i.e. Ms. Pinky and Ms. Rashmi were the eye-witnesses of the entire act of gruesome killing and Ms. Pinky has herself sustained...
Read More
Brief Facts The allegation against the Appellant, along with one deceased and five others, was that they conspired to intimidate and commit the murder PW­3 and his relatives. The brother of PW-3 was killed by the accused persons. It is pertinent to note that admittedly the only allegation against the present Appellant (accused no.2) is...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant No. 1 got married with the complainant on 04.12.2003 and soon after marriage disputes arose between the parties and they started residing separately. Thereafter, the wife-complainant filed a complaint and upon investigation, the charge sheet came to be filed for the offences punishable under Section 498-A IPC and Sections 3 and...
Read More
Issues Whether a person can be convicted of criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC solely for having concealed the location of the incriminating materials/ articles and, in the absence of any evidence establishing meeting of the minds in case all the other accused have been acquitted? Duties and responsibilities of Investigating Officer under Chapter XII...
Read More
1 10 11 12 13 14 21

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."