Month

April 2025
Brief Facts A complaint was lodged by the father of the minor girl (‘M’) alleging that his daughter was kidnapped by the Appellant and his associates when ‘M’ was returning back home after a doctor’s appointment with her elder sisters. The incident was narrated to the complainant by his elder daughter who was present with...
Read More
Brief Facts The case of the prosecution is that the complainant XYZ lodged an F.I.R. against the appellant-accused stating therein that on 22.03.2016, at about 05:00 hours in the evening, Accused came to Complainant’s house and took his son aged about 10 years in the temple. There appellant gave Rs.20 to complainant’s son, i.e. the...
Read More
Brief Facts The prosecution alleges that A-1 to A-7 were engaged in a criminal conspiracy to defraud BHEL in awarding a contract for constructing desalination plants. A-1, then Executive Director of BHEL, directed Bhaskar Rao (the DGM and Approver) to issue limited tenders without proper pre-qualification. A-1 specified four fictitious firms and M/s Entoma Hydro...
Read More
Brief Facts On 31.05.2015, the victim was missing and as per the last seen witness, she was seen going to the house of Munna Pandey (Appellant) for watching television. While the Complainant went to the house of Appellant in search of the victim, it was found that the house of the Appellant was locked. When...
Read More
Brief Facts A Food Inspector appointed under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PFA) visited ‘Easy day’ outlet on 29.11.2010 and purchased certain biscuit packets. Subsequently, on the next day, the acquired samples were dispatched to the State Food Laboratory in Bhopal for analysis. Further, the Public Analyst’s Report was received on 04.01.2011. Subsequently,...
Read More
Brief Facts That Appellant filed a criminal complaint before Magistrate Court on 20.02.2016 regarding dishonoured cheques worth Rs. 45,20,000. The court issued summons to the accused and subsequently the prosecution evidence, defense evidence has been conducted. During final arguments, the Magistrate determined that the complaint lacked territorial jurisdiction. Consequently, the Accused was discharged on 18.02.2020,...
Read More
Brief Facts The present appeal was preferred by the State of Rajasthan against the judgment passed by the High Court, allowing the application filed by the respondent – Asharam @ Ashumal under Section 391 of the CrPC, 1973 , and directing summoning and recording of evidence of Ajay Pal Lamba, who was posted as Deputy...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellants were convicted under Section 302 read with 149 IPC by the Sessions Court, which was confirmed by the High Court. They approached the Apex Court on the ground that conviction based upon unreliable testimony of a child witness is not sustainable as the witness has failed to rightly identify the accused...
Read More
Brief Facts The Complainant filed a complaint against some of the police officials stating that they entered the house of the Complainant and started beating and abusing the Complainant and his brother. These police officials looted the Complainant and his family members, snatched their gold chain and thereafter the Complainant and his family members were...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant was not named in the FIR registered under sections 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC and sections 3(1)(r) & (s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 (SC/ST Act). However, the Appellant was summoned by the Ld. Special Court to face the trial in exercise...
Read More
1 2 3 4 5 6 14

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."