Ranjit Digal v. State of Odisha S.L.P (CRL.) No. 8926/2023

Brief Facts

  • That the Appellant filed an appeal against the interim bail granted by the High Court wherein the Hon’ble High Court came to the conclusion that Appellant is entitled to bail but the Appellant was enlarged on bail only for the period of 3 months.

Issues

  • Whether the High Court was justified in restricting the period of the bail to a period of three months only?

Held

  • Supreme Court allowed the appeal and extended the interim bail till disposal of the case before the trial court.
  • Once the High Court came to the conclusion that the appellant was entitled to bail, there was no reason to restrict the bail to the period of three months.

Relevant Page No.

  • 1

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."