Manorama Naik v. The State Of Odisha & Anr., Criminal Appeal No. 423/2022

Issues

  • Whether the opinion of the handwriting expert is the only way or mode of proving the signature and handwriting of a person?
  • Whether the order of cognizance for offence under Section 467 and 471 of IPC can be quashed only on the ground that the opinion of the handwriting expert was not conclusive?

Held

  • The order of the High Court was set aside with the liberty to accused to raise all questions and contentions before the Trial Court.
  • The signatures and handwriting of the person can also be proved under Sections 45, 47 and 73 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Therefore, opinion of the handwriting expert is not the only way or mode of proving the signature and handwriting of a person.

Relevant Page No.

  • 1

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."