Category

Evidence During Trial
Brief Facts The present appeal was filed before the Supreme Court challenging the judgment passed by the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court in the Confirmation Case and Criminal Appeal whereby the High Court confirmed the death penalty awarded to the Appellant (Digambar) and life imprisonment to another accused-Appellant (Mohan) for the offence punishable...
Read More
Brief Facts The three accused were convicted under section 304B of IPC by the Trial Court. The accused preferred an appeal before the High Court. The High Court acquitted the father-in-law of the deceased. Due to death of the mother-in–law of the deceased the High Court abated her appeal. But the High Court confirmed the...
Read More
Brief Facts The accused challenged their conviction under Section 302 IPC by the Trial Court which was confirmed by the High Court. Issues Whether the testimony of the interested injured eye-witness can be discredited in case of proved previous enmity between the deceased and accused persons? Whether previous enmity can be a motive for false...
Read More
Brief Facts On 30th December 2002 PW 1, Ajay who was 11 years old, and his mother (deceased) were sleeping in their house. At around 1 am Ajay heard the noise of his mother and he saw the Appellant (Accused No. 2) along with help of Vikki (Accused No. 1) were grappling the deceased and...
Read More
Brief Facts Complainant, father of deceased filed a FIR upon discovering his son’s dead body in a forest, 150 meters west of Government Inter College, alleging therein that: on 31.10.2001, at about 21:00 Hours, the deceased was with his friends Govind and Ravi Bangali (later identified as Ravi Mandal); Govind, accused, had been influencing his...
Read More
Brief Facts • The Respondent was held guilty of offence under section 302 of IPC by the trial court upon finding that the circumstantial evidence formed a complete chain, good enough to convict the Respondent. The respondent being aggrieved by the said judgment filed an appeal before the High Court which found that there were...
Read More
Brief Facts On 05.09.1985, the father of the Complainant was tragically murdered at around 10:00 AM. Following this, on the same day at approx 12:10 PM, complainant (PW-2) filed a complaint, resulting in lodging of a FIR under Section 302 of the IPC. The individuals accused of this crime were Munna Lal, Sheo Lal, Babu...
Read More
Brief Facts The accused, along with others, was involved in killing the taxi driver through a conspiracy by taking him to an isolated place, killing him and stealing car and other belongings of deceased and burying his dead body. When the deceased could not be contacted a complaint was lodged at the police station, however,...
Read More
Brief Facts The deceased, Altaf Hussain, had a land dispute with the accused appellants, who are father and son. In connection with the said land dispute, proceedings were pending before the Consolidation Officer and on the fateful day (04.08.1995) the deceased Altaf Hussain was going to Roorkee for attending the said proceedings on his bicycle....
Read More
Brief Facts Appellant, was convicted by the High Court for the murder of his wife. Initially acquitted by the trial court, Appellant faced charges under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC for allegedly killing his wife with a knife. The post-mortem revealed 17 incised wounds on wife’s body. Appellant, who claimed innocence, asserted that...
Read More
1 2 3 4 5

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."