By

Mohit Khandelwal & Associates
Brief Facts Appellant, was convicted by the High Court for the murder of his wife. Initially acquitted by the trial court, Appellant faced charges under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC for allegedly killing his wife with a knife. The post-mortem revealed 17 incised wounds on wife’s body. Appellant, who claimed innocence, asserted that...
Read More
Brief Facts That the Appellant (Ram Pratap) and the deceased knew each other very well and were on visiting terms to each other houses. They used to spend time together and were friends. On 13.12.2007 at 10.00 AM, the Appellant had visited the deceased house. They both took tea together at the house of the...
Read More
Brief Facts The Trial Court, based on the extra judicial confessional statement of accused convicted both the accused in relation to offences punishable under Section 302/34 IPC and 201/34 IPC. In addition to the extra-judicial confession of witnesses PW-1 and PW-7, the prosecution also placed reliance on the recovery of keys of the shop of...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant has assailed the correctness of the judgment and order of the High Court dismissing the appeal of the appellant while confirming the conviction recorded by the Trial Court under Section 302/34 of the IPC and 201 of IPC whereby he was awarded imprisonment for life and allied sentences to run concurrently....
Read More
Brief Facts The Case pertains to murder of deceased in broad daylight. The trial court convicted all eight accused persons on the basis of unrefuted testimony of PW-1 eyewitness which was supported by unrefuted part of testimony of hostile witness PW-7. Most of the other prosecution witnesses had turned hostile. High Court concurred with the...
Read More
Brief Facts The FIR registered in 1996 by the prosecutrix, who alleged that she was abducted and raped by the accused multiple times over a period of three days. The prosecutrix claimed that on 22.07.1996, she was taken from a maize field near her home by Avtar Singh, who rendered her unconscious. She regained consciousness...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant was convicted for murdering his wife on suspicion of the deceased having the illicit intimacy with some other person. The case of the prosecution was based on the extra judicial confession made by Appellant to village administrative officer (PW-1). The prosecution further relied on the recovery of the dead body and...
Read More
Brief Facts The FIR was lodged by the deceased’s brother, who found the victim lying dead at his home and took him to the hospital, where he was declared dead. Suspicion fell on the victim’s son due to a property dispute. During interrogation, the son revealed name of two associates, Kamal Kishore and Manoj, appellants...
Read More
Brief Facts The allegations on the accused were that the Accused took his two sons, aged about 9 years and 6 years, to Haiderpur Canal, strangulated them, and threw the dead bodies into the canal; and the accused thereafter, attempted to project as if it were a case of accidental drowning. It was also alleged...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 302 of IPC. As per the case of the Appellant the deceased and the Appellant were posted in the same police station. The deceased was engaged in conversation on the telephone of the Police Station and the Appellant went to ask him to end...
Read More
1 14 15 16 17 18 21

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."