Month

October 2025
Brief Facts Case was pertaining to the death of a lady due to gunshot wound and FIR was lodged by her son alleging that the Appellant and Lala Ram came to his residence. Lala Ram had instigated Ram Singh by loudly saying that these people were creating disturbances; so kill them. Ram Singh fired on...
Read More
Brief Facts Between 2017 and 2020, IHFL sanctioned loans worth ₹2,801 crores to the Shipra Group, which defaulted on repayment. Consequently, IHFL auctioned Shipra Group’s property, Shipra Mall, which was purchased by Himri Estate. Mohit Singh, representing the Shipra Group, filed FIRs against IHFL and Himri Estate, alleging the mall was undervalued, causing state revenue...
Read More
Brief Facts The FIR was registered against the Appellant accused being a member of a gang which was involved in several criminal cases as enlisted in the FIR. The FIR narrated that the gang has a criminal history and consequently the FIR was registered under section 3(1) of the Gangster Act. The application was moved...
Read More
Brief Facts In this Appeal the NIO investigated a module of the banned terrorist organization that aimed to further the Khalistan separatist movement. Accused were arrested after being linked to terrorist activities, including attempts to procure weapons. The appellant’s involvement was based on a disclosure statement by a co-accused, describing a trip to procure weapons....
Read More
Brief Facts The appellants, Rajesh Viren Shah and Sanjay Babulal Bhutada (Directors of the Company), were implicated as accused individuals in a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, pertaining to the dishonouring of cheques dated 22 March 2014 issued by the Respondent Company. However, these directors had resigned from the...
Read More
Brief Facts The present petition sought a transfer of the complaint from the Court of ACMM Ahmedabad to a Court in Delhi. The Respondent filed a private complaint against the Petitioner alleging defamation under Section 499 and 500 of the IPC. The respondent claimed that the petitioner defamed the people of Gujarat by calling them...
Read More
Brief Facts A  clinic run by the Appellant was inspected by State officials, revealing 29 types of allopathic medicines without the necessary sales license. The Trial Court convicted the Appellant and sentenced him to two years of rigorous imprisonment and fines for commission of offence under Section 18 (c) read with Section 27 (b)(ii) of...
Read More
Brief Facts CBI registered an FIR following a complaint alleging a criminal conspiracy by Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd. (DHFL) and others, including the respondents, to defraud a consortium of 17 banks of approximately Rs. 34,000 crores between 2010 and 2019. The respondents were arrested on 19.07.2022 and remanded to judicial custody on 30.07.2022. On...
Read More
Brief Facts The Appellant, the owner of a daily newspaper faced prosecution for criminal defamation under Section 500 of the IPC. The Respondent-Complainant filed a complaint claiming that the Appellant allowed the defamatory news article to be published titled “Advocate ne pan masala vyavasayi par karaya jhuta mamla darj” in his newspaper, without verifying the...
Read More
Brief Facts The appellant (wife) and respondent (husband) were living in London, but the husband abandoned the wife, leading her to live with relatives. The wife later gave birth to a child in India and, following the husband’s instructions, applied for a passport for the child. Since, the husband was causing the physical and mental...
Read More
1 2

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."