Jayaben v. Tejas Kanubhai Zala and another Criminal Appeal No. 1655/2021

Case Study Caption

Brief Facts

In the present case, deceased was brutally beaten by the accused and without considering the seriousness of the offences alleged and despite the statements of the eye witnesses, CCTV footage, the High Court vide its impugned orders have released the accused on bail. The bail order was challenged by the Complainant before the Apex Court.

Issues

  • What shall be the approach of the State when the lower court has released an accused on bail in a heinous/serious criminal matters?
  • Whether the passage of long time from the date of being released on bail can be a relevant factor for not interfering with the erroneous bail order passed by the High Court?

Held

  • The Apex Court quashed the bail order of the High Court and the accused were directed to surrender.
  • The State ought to have been very serious even to maintain the rule of law in a serious matter like this where a person was brutally murdered/killed while he was just collecting scrap outside the factory with his wife and aunt. It is the duty of the Director of Prosecution and the State to ensure that the guilty are booked and punished.
  • We hope and trust that in future the State Government/Legal Department of the State Government and the Director of Prosecution shall take prompt decision in matters such as this and challenge the order passed by the trial court and/or the High Court, as the case may be, where it is found that the accused are released on bail in serious offences like the present.
  • That by not filing the appeals by the State against the impugned judgments and orders releasing the accused on bail in such a serious matter, the State has failed to protect the rights of the victim. We are of the opinion that this was the fit case where the State ought to have preferred the appeals challenging the orders passed by the High Court releasing the accused on bail. In criminal matters the party who is treated as the aggrieved party is the State which is the custodian of the social interest of the community at large and so it is for the State to take all the steps necessary for bringing the person who has acted against the social interest of the community to book.
  • It is reported that in the State there is a Director of Prosecution. Even the Director of Prosecution has failed to perform his duties in the instant case. The post of Director of Prosecution is a very important post in so far as the administration of justice in criminal matters is concerned. It is the duty of the Director of Prosecution to take prompt decision. Given that crimes are treated as a wrong against the society as a whole, the role of the Director of Prosecution 
    in the administration of justice is crucial. He is appointed by the State Government in exercise of powers under Section 25Aof the Code of Criminal Procedure. That his crucial role is evident from conditions such as in Section 25A (2) of the Code, which stipulates a minimum legal experience of not less than ten years for a person to be eligible to be Directorate of Prosecution and that such an appointment shall be made with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of the High Court.
  • As per the settled preposition of law, cancellation of bail and quashing and setting aside the wrong order passed by the High Court releasing the accused on bail stand on different footings. There are different considerations while considering the   application   for   cancellation   of   bail   for   breach   of conditions etc., and while considering an order passed by the Court releasing the accused on bail. Once, it is found that the order passed by the High Court releasing the accused on bail is unsustainable, necessary consequences shall have to follow and the bail has to be cancelled. 

Relevant Para No.

9.4 & 11

"Disclaimer & Confirmation As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. By clicking on the “I AGREE” button below, user acknowledges the following:​

There has been no advertisements, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; user wishes to gain more information about Mohit Khandelwal and Associates and its attorneys for his/her own information and use;

The information about us is provided to the user on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at their own volition and any transmission.

We are not responsible for any reliance that a user places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage.

However, the user is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources."